LARGEST PRIVATE LEGAL STRIKE ON CORPORATE CRIME EVER

Five federal lawsuits. $40 billion in claims. Dozens of unlawful seizures exposed.

This urgent briefing reveals Amazon’s secret operation of what amounts to a privatized legal regime — seizing funds, blacklisting businesses, and erasing brands through fraud, racketeering, and internal sabotage. These lawsuits demand restitution, equity recognition, and federal intervention.

This release was sent directly to 62 major figures and institutions, including:

• The White House

• Donald Trump

• The New York Times, The Guardian, Wired, ProPublica

• FTC Chair Lina Khan

• U.S. DOJ Antitrust Division

• Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Josh Hawley

• Legal teams in Seattle and DC

• Harvard and Stanford Law

• High-profile journalists and cultural influencers including Elon Musk, Glenn Greenwald, Russell Brand, and Matt Taibbi

FULL PRESS RELEASE

PRESS RECIPIENT LIST

Equity Restitution Lawsuit $40 Billion claim against Amazon for defrauding a near-founder whose innovations built the Marketplace—and were stolen to fuel its empire.

EQUITY LAWSUIT

EXHIBITS

Conversion & Fraud Lawsuit Amazon looted bank accounts and rigged arbitration to avoid justice.

ARBITRATION FRAUD LAWSUIT

EXHIBITS

Perjury & Conspiracy Lawsuit Amazon lawyers and operatives deceived a federal judge to sabotage a rightful case—now they’re being held to account.

CONSPIRACY LAWSUIT

EXHIBITS

RICO Lawsuit Amazon faces racketeering charges for a coordinated criminal enterprise involving wire fraud, deception, and systemic abuse.

RICO LAWSUIT

EXHIBITS

Lanham Act Lawsuit Amazon hijacked the role of the U.S. Patent Office—overriding trademarks, erasing brands, and replacing them with corporate fraud.

TRADEMARK LAWSUIT

EXHIBITS

Share Your Story & Join The Movement

CASE STUDIES

Amazon has been shutting down businesses under various false flag pretenses and then confiscating already-earned monies due and payable to the business. Amazon banks the money for businesses and after taking out their fees, the balance goes to the business. If you sell something for 10 dollars, Amazon may take 7 dollars and then you keep 3 dollars. They then hold your three dollars until the date of your ACH disbursement and then disburse to you. When they close an account, they confiscate the funds indefinitely while they force you to do these mindless appeals with their dysfunctional appeal system. So that 3 dollars (times however many sales you had) that they’re supposed to ACH disburse to you, they hold onto during this so-called “appeals process”, aka, the “treason trials”.…During the appeal process, they ask for affidavits and documents showing no relationship with the other companies. Sometimes the companies they accuse you of being related to is yourself. See the Melbourne Place case study below. This is when Amazon’s automated process gets sloppy at covering its tracks and you can see that their allegations are completely fabricated just to steal your money and no other reason. Further proof is that no matter what happens in the appeals process… you lose. Even if you show beyond a shadow of a doubt with affidavits and police reports and legal documents, Amazon’s automated bludgener machine just continues to say the same exact words over and over to you “we need more information” and they deny your appeal. A person facing this automated system is not much unlike someone facing Caligula’s Treason Trials where you are accused of treason in a circular logic. Ultimately, Amazon continues to bleed YOUR money out of YOUR bank holding account with them until it’s all gone, with fake charges such as 300 dollars to throw away a small box of inventory that they slowly continue to do for the next three plus years. After they spend all the money they owe you on trumped up ridiculous charges such as the disposal service, they then start to debit you and try to confiscate the rest of your assets via illegal ACH debits to your business account. The goal of the movement is to get the government, politicians involved, or Amazon internally involved to stop this practice as it is straight grand larceny theft under Virginia law https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter5/section18.2-95/ where we are protesting and should be an illegal criminal theft under the laws of every single state in the union and the federal government. We’re planning a series of marches on Amazon headquarters to help sellers get their stolen money back.

There was a very successful company on Amazon called Melbourne Place which had extremely high customer satisfaction. Amazon sent them a notice stating that they were associated with themselves one day and closed their account. There was no warning, there was no questions asked by Amazon. It was just one ramdom day while the owner was at Disney World with his kid, he opened an email and was horrified. He thought surely he could handle this “mistake” and get his account restored, but he never did. Every time he cleared the association with one cmpany, Amazon would pull another association out of thin air, and they ultimately told Melbourne Place that they were associated with Melbourne Place and to prove they were not connected. You can’t prove you’re not connected to yourself. But what this does prove is that the account association seizures by Amazon are not based in actual researched evidence, but are more likely an automated process set in motion by illicit programmers (perhaps like Eric Smith, manager of risk management at Amazon, https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-smith-00305450/) to randomly attack those with money. This proves Amazon’s accusations are nonsense accusations designed to increase their holdings by stealing from mom and pop sellers. Amazon operates much like the Mad Emperor Caligula who would accuse Senators of treason with no basis whatsoever, merely to steal their money and lands.

KangAus was a wholesale client of the owner of Central Concepts and sold the same products that Central sold, and for that reason alone, KangAus had his account shut down and his money stolen stolen. He was told he was related to the Central Concepts account. By this logic, anyone who buys products from Nestle foods and sells on Amazon would be related because its the same product. All of this “Amazon logic” is just a pretense to clear out the seller, accuse him of some fake association, take his assets and money, steal his brands, bootleg his intellectual property, and amass more wealth illegally and criminally. Coincidentally, Amazon was in need to improve their bottom line when they started doing this whole “YOU ARE GUILTY OF TREASON AND WE WILL CONFISCATE YOUR MONEY AND LANDS” routine. This is not much different than what Mad Emperor Caligula did with Roman senators when he was low on cash to build golden statutes of himself, he would randomly accuse wealthy Roman senators of treason just to liquidate their cash and land.

After roughly a decade of selling on Amazon to highly satisfied customers with multiple trademarked brands, Amazon shut down the Central Concepts, Inc’ selling account claiming it was related to an account called Arizona Corp. Central Concepts had no relation to any other selling account. At the time, Central Concepts had about a million dollars worth of retail valued inventory sitting at FBA fulfillment centers that took an enormous amount of warehouse labor to prep and send to Amazon fulfillment centers and it had about 60 thousand dollars ready to disburse. Flash forward years later, Central Concepts never saw any of that 60 thousand dollars and its inventory was mostly destroyed. To think this could happen over a random accusation with no basis is unbelievable. To think, even if this accusation was true, and Central Concepts was secretly running another company called Arizona Corp, who cares? Central Concepts has been asked by Walmart to open numerous accounts, what’s the harm in having different product lines on different accounts? Even if guilty, does it justify Amazon stealing money and inventory from Central? Now, consider that Central Concepts was not at all guilty. Central Concepts’ attorneys and CEO submitted documents and affidavits to clear its name and still Amazon always stated “we need more infomation…” with never any clarify on what more info they needed.

Duke’s Deals was a wholesaler of mine for years, I had to go through painstaking efforts every time I wanted to get him approved for a brand I’d own, as in the captioned attachment Dukes Deals Brand Approval. Amazon would always ask for a Letter of Authorization from him and I would always provide all wholesalers with the same Letter of Authorization that was extremely easy to verify. It would provide all the brand details, my contact information, and the contact information for the attorney registered with the United States Department of Patent and Trademarks. There’s no potential for the information to be false as it is verifiable but Amazon would continue to deny him for months and then one random day, approve him with no new information.